The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case challenging the president's birthright citizenship order on April 1.
Immigration Matters is a recurring series by César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández that analyzes the court’s immigration docket, ...
Opinion
SCOTUSblog on MSNOpinion
Birthright citizenship: why the text, history, and structure of a landmark 1952 statute doom Trump’s executive order 14160
Brothers in Law is a recurring series by brothers Akhil and Vikram Amar, with special emphasis on measuring what the Supreme Court says against what the Constitution itself says. For more content from ...
This year marks the 128th year of the United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the landmark Supreme Court decision that established ...
The three post–Civil War constitutional amendments offered the United States a second, more democratic founding. Preserving this framework is essential. It became clear to me that the framers ...
Opinion
SCOTUSblog on MSNOpinion
The 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause does not codify English principles of subjectship
Critics and supporters of President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship often focus on the order’s barring of automatic citizenship to children born to individuals unlawfully ...
Every American citizen owes a debt of gratitude to John Mercer Langston, architect of the 14th Amendment and founding dean of the Howard University School of Law. His writings and speeches are ...
As a general rule, babies born in the United States of America are citizens of the United States of America. There isn’t any question about that. It’s in the Constitution, 14th Amendment: “All persons ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results